Home » Film Reviews » Film Review: Furious 6

Film Review: Furious 6


Furious 6, the sixth installment of the Fast and Furious franchise, does what The Lone Ranger refused to do: it creates heroes who unironically stand for the right thing, all the time. It also proves that a such a moral-driven movie can still be a lot of fun. Albeit by ditching reality for a ton of big action.

The plot doesn’t make a lot of sense. But there are a ton of cars.

For no real reason, Dominic and his friends have risen from small-time criminals to the sort of person that an ace DSS agent turns to for help in catching an international terrorist. He does so. They help him, in hopes of reconnected with Dom’s long-time, presumed dead girlfriend and of getting full pardons for their considerable crimes. A ton of action scenes held together purely through character moments and a terrible plot ensues.

A plot point involving Paul Walker being sent to prison under a fake name, in order to get information from another criminal about Shaw, the guy they’re after, makes very little sense, and serves no plot purpose. It’s basically done in order to connect to the past films: Walker meets his buddy from the first film, and then is threatened by the villain from the fourth film.

Gina Carano still needs to learn how to act. She also served very little purpose, probably because the editors realized her acting was so bad that they needed to trim all her lines. She gets like a dozen in the whole film. It’s sad, as she’s possibly the best fighter in the entire film: her subway battle with Michelle Rodriguez was a highlight.

Plenty of humor came organically out of the film, both when it was trying to be funny and when it wasn’t, but the situation was so fun and ridiculous that it became funny. But when the film tried to create it’s own, purely humorous moments, it fell flat. There’s a scene where Ludachris and the Rock humiliate a British guy who was rude to them by forcing him to take off his shirt and pants. It really wasn’t funny.

The focus on family was a little strong: it was harped on every 20 minutes that they all stuck together because family never leaves anyone behind. Still, it’s refreshing to see a film to blatantly sentimental. It works throughout the film: at the climax, I still felt that the stakes were high, despite all the past carnage, because the family was being threatened.

As long as you don’t mind valuing fun, moderately moral adventure over logic, this is a fun film. They have a post-credits scene teasing a seventh, but it remains to be seen if they can actually top themselves with it.



3 thoughts on “Film Review: Furious 6

  1. 90% of the time, a sixth movie in a franchise means that it’s going to suck and it’ll ruin the franchise. It turns out, there are exceptions. Nice review Adam.

  2. I recently (yesterday) watched this movie, and felt it was just like the other fast and furious movies. It was a good watch but I wouldn’t really consider it to scrutinize for review because it’s one of those mindless movies that you put on while finishing up some homework.
    I didn’t understand the purpose of the opening scene. I kept hoping that it would be a part of the climax, but it wasn’t. Also, they did a horrible job of linking all these movies to Tokyo Drift. I am still not sure of the connection because if the post-film shots are from the seventh movie (which I think they totally copied the style from the Pirates of the Caribbean movies), then Sung Kang dies in Tokyo Drift. So he can’t really die in the seventh one. I hope they don’t ruin it. Because Sung had the same car he was driving in this scene in Tokyo Drift.
    I agree with you about “Shaw” being the villain. He wasn’t really necessary in the story. But his fight scenes were impressive.
    The humor was too dry and forceful. A guy who chartered a private plane says that the only way he stays a millionaire is by asking for change. Didn’t really make sense to me.
    Also, I didn’t quite understand the purpose of a tank in the middle of a freeway. Was the chip in the tank, and if it was, why? During that time, they didn’t mention anything about the chip.
    Not only Gina, but I believe Paul is over the top too. His dialogues when he is talking about never having experience chasing a military man was just too cheesy. Just like most of the Vin Diesel’s dialogues.

    Good review though. 🙂

    • I think the seventh one happens after Tokyo Drift, which is why they haven’t tied it in yet. Jason Stathem kills Sung, and then he’s the villain for the seventh one.

      It’s all definitely cheesy and dumb, but it’s still somehow a lot more fun than most cheesy dumb films. Which is interesting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s